Subject	Ona a similar note... 5spd NA vs. 2001 V6 Conv. auto stang?
Posted by	Jackie Chan (RH2-SWEET!) on September 25, 2001 at 9:09 PM
	This message has been viewed 26 times.
In Reply To	300zx NA vs. 1987 Mustang GT... posted by kydspd on September 25, 2001 at 08:44 PM
Message	My buddy has a V6 auto convertible 2001 Mustang, with an intake. Would this be anything to worry about with a stock 5spd NA? They are rated at like 190hp or something, and quite a bit heavier than our cars. Just curious.
Follow Ups	300zx NA vs. 1987 Mustang GT... - kydspd 20:44:02 09/25/01 5.0 has your # if it's running well.... (n/m) - Aseem 20:46:26 09/25/01 I'd say close call n/m - Mike@ZSpeed 20:48:19 09/25/01 Mustang: 0-60 in 6.2; 1/4 in 14.5; top speed 138mph. (n/m) - TTony 20:50:00 09/25/01 screw magazines stats, its all about the driver (n/m) - CaptanZap(Bay Area) 20:58:36 09/25/01 blind lady with Mclaren F1 Beat Z TT stage-rocket booster (n/m) - Aseem 21:01:00 09/25/01 both 5 speeds ? (n/m) - MattZ 20:54:13 09/25/01 i beat an 88 a little while ago (n/m) - Grendelrt(VA) 21:02:06 09/25/01 they're both 5spds, NA has air intake, and from moving start (n/m) - kydspd 21:10:53 09/25/01 Ona a similar note... 5spd NA vs. 2001 V6 Conv. auto stang? - Jackie Chan (RH2-SWEET!) 21:09:26 09/25/01 non-conv. should do 60 in the mid-7's (n/m) - Aseem 21:13:10 09/25/01 Not even a race. NA hands down. (n/m) - ZLooker 23:08:49 09/25/01 NA, i burned 2 gt's the other day >:oP (n/m) - HalfnHalf702 23:26:05 09/25/01 30 to 60? That's over in a flash.. - MikeeZ 08:56:04 09/26/01
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.