TwinTurbo.NET: Nissan 300ZX forum - Ona a similar note... 5spd NA vs. 2001 V6 Conv. auto stang?
Subject
Ona a similar note... 5spd NA vs. 2001 V6 Conv. auto stang?
Posted by
Jackie Chan (RH2-SWEET!)
on September 25, 2001 at 9:09 PM
This message has been viewed
26
times.
In Reply To
300zx NA vs. 1987 Mustang GT...
posted by kydspd
on September 25, 2001 at 08:44 PM
Message
My buddy has a V6 auto convertible 2001 Mustang, with an intake. Would this be anything to worry about with a stock 5spd NA? They are rated at like 190hp or something, and quite a bit heavier than our cars. Just curious.
Follow Ups
300zx NA vs. 1987 Mustang GT...
-
kydspd
20:44:02 09/25/01
5.0 has your # if it's running well.... (n/m)
-
Aseem
20:46:26 09/25/01
I'd say close call n/m
-
Mike@ZSpeed
20:48:19 09/25/01
Mustang: 0-60 in 6.2; 1/4 in 14.5; top speed 138mph. (n/m)
-
TTony
20:50:00 09/25/01
screw magazines stats, its all about the driver (n/m)
-
CaptanZap(Bay Area)
20:58:36 09/25/01
blind lady with Mclaren F1 Beat Z TT stage-rocket booster (n/m)
-
Aseem
21:01:00 09/25/01
both 5 speeds ? (n/m)
-
MattZ
20:54:13 09/25/01
i beat an 88 a little while ago (n/m)
-
Grendelrt(VA)
21:02:06 09/25/01
they're both 5spds, NA has air intake, and from moving start (n/m)
-
kydspd
21:10:53 09/25/01
Ona a similar note... 5spd NA vs. 2001 V6 Conv. auto stang? -
Jackie Chan (RH2-SWEET!)
21:09:26 09/25/01
non-conv. should do 60 in the mid-7's (n/m)
-
Aseem
21:13:10 09/25/01
Not even a race. NA hands down. (n/m)
-
ZLooker
23:08:49 09/25/01
NA, i burned 2 gt's the other day >:oP (n/m)
-
HalfnHalf702
23:26:05 09/25/01
30 to 60? That's over in a flash..
-
MikeeZ
08:56:04 09/26/01
Post a
Followup
You cannot reply to this message because you are not
logged in
.